![]() They both obviously share the DeviceID but "Grenada" cards have their revision number bumped to 8h (instead of 0h on Hawaii). AMD changed the fused configuration in a way the driver can tell the difference between "the old" Hawaii and "the new" Grenada cards. The down sides in using high leakage ASICs are the higher temperatures through the board and higher power consumption (due temperatures and lower VRM efficiency).Īny performance difference between "Hawaii" and "Grenada" cards is caused by the display driver. Higher leakage makes it possible reach higher clocks without violating the design electrical characteristics of the die, in terms of voltage. "Grenada XT" has the highest leakage characteristics of Hawaii family. The dies are binned for lowest possible leakage characteristics in order to reduce the power consumption and dissipated heat. The XT(L) bin is the highest quality of Hawaii family ASICs. The only difference between the full variants (i.e. "There is no physical difference between project 215-08520xx ("Hawaii") and 215-08800xx ("Grenada") ASICs. Here is the expression of the appellation working for AMD: Although flash process of BIOS 390 to 290 cards, it's not just a performance quite it. Still, there is speculation whether this is just a rebrand or for minor changes inside the core. What is under the cooler shield we will see later (I have plan to test temperatures comparison with stock TIM vs Gelid Extreme TIM)Ĭore AMD called "Grenada" is based on previous news chip, AMD Hawaii. Overall, the Core i3-6100 is an average performer with its 2-cores and 4-threads in this benchmark.First time we take a minute for design of the card. Intel's Core i3-6100 notches a small win over the Core i3-4150, but opens up an impressive lead over the stock A6-7470K. That higher score is a byproduct of the A6-7470K's extra threads. The less expensive 2-core A6-7470K provides far more performance in these tests, and it also sells for ~$215.7. The Core i3-6100's performance earns it the 33rd place. The Core i3-4150 clearly shows how significantly the entry-level Haswell Refresh-based CPUs fall behind the Skylake-S models. That's a ~0.6% generational speed-up in this title. Again, the Core i3-4150 tumbles down the chart, falling behind its Skylake-S-based successor. In this benchmark, the Core i3-6100 has an impressive performance, which is way ahead of the last generation Core i3-4150 by 0.6%. The Core i3-6100 takes a comfortable 4.2% lead over the A6-7470K. It is 0.3% lower than the Core i3-6300 while being 0% higher than the Core i3-4170. The Core i3-6100 sits between Core i3-6300 and Core i3-4170. Overall, the Pentium G4600 is an average performer with its 2-cores and 4-threads in this benchmark. Intel's Pentium G4600 notches a small win over the Pentium G4500, but opens up an impressive lead over the stock A6-7470K. The Pentium G4600's performance earns it the 48th place. ![]() The Pentium G4500 clearly shows how significantly the entry-level Skylake-S-based CPUs fall behind the Kaby Lake-S models. Again, the Pentium G4500 tumbles down the chart, falling behind its Kaby Lake-S-based successor. ![]() In this benchmark, the Pentium G4600 has an impressive performance, which is way ahead of the last generation Pentium G4500 by 0.6%. The Pentium G4600 takes a comfortable 0.8% lead over the A6-7470K. It is 0% lower than the Pentium G3470 while being 0.2% higher than the A6-7480. The Pentium G4600 sits between Pentium G3470 and A6-7480.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |